As I’ve spent the last 10 days recovering from surgery to repair a large hernia tear I’ve had plenty of time to watch England and England Lions’ cricket tours against Pakistan and Bangladesh ‘A’ respectively.
I’m not going to follow those who suddenly think England are a rubbish team, but I do think England’s preparation and team selection have been questionable at the start of the series in UAE against Pakistan.
Let’s start with the strange selections, I was genuinely shocked when Nottinghamshire all rounder Samit Patel didn’t even make the squad. England prefer to play three quick bowlers in test cricket, but the ground in Dubai where two of the three tests in this series are taking place, are suited to spin bowling, so including Patel to bat at six would have seemed the obvious solution. Patel has a decent record for England in limited overs cricket both as a spin bowler and a batsman and he had a strong summer.
In contrast Eoin Morgan has struggled to settle in to test cricket and his lower than expected batting average has not been improved with a string of failures on this tour. So not only would Patel have added a significant extra string to England’s bow as far as bowling goes, there’s a good chance he would have batted better than Morgan too.
So we get to the team selection for the first test, Swann, Broad and Anderson had three places nailed down, which left Tremlett, Panesar, Finn and Onions competing for one spot. I am a fan of Chris Tremlett but he has been struggling with an eye infection that has by his own admission seriously hampered him and he took the least wickets of the four candidates in the warm up matches, yet it was he that was given the chance in the first test. Some would describe this as a gamble and as he didn’t take a wicket, had by far the worst economy rate of the quick bowlers in the England side and contributed nothing with the bat, the gamble most certainly failed.
The ground for the second test is supposedly a batsman’s paradise so if I was selecting the England team I would bring in Ravi Bopara and one of Finn or Panesar to replace Morgan and Tremlett. I don’t rate Bopara but with Patel not there and a lot of overs to bowl the Essex all rounder will offer the best support to the main bowlers and will struggle to bat any worse than Morgan. The choice of Finn or Panesar has to come down to whether the pitch is likely to take much spin, a question impossible to answer until England see the condition of the pitch.
I also mentioned preparation, I genuinely think nobody took the challenge presented by Pakistan that seriously, whether it’s the media or the ECB everyone seems to have under done their preparation. With the fact that England have rarely played in UAE and Pakistan have played there a lot in the past couple of years, a third practice match was surely needed.
A number of the England batsmen got little time in the middle and most of the bowlers only got one game, which gave very few players time to get used to conditions their opponents are very familiar with. The fact that a lot of the English media seemed shocked when Mohammed Hafeez came on to bowl after just five overs on the first day also shows a desperate lack of research, Hafeez has been opening the bowling for Pakistan in limited overs cricket for nearly a year now, so if they wanted to use spin early surely someone used to bowling with a new ball was the most likely candidate.
All of these errors certainly contributed to a very poor performance from England in the first test, but they can still avoid disaster. England don’t need to win this series to keep their world number 1 ranking, in fact if they lose the series 1-0 or 2-1 they will still be world number 1. This is worth remembering as England will have to improve massively by the time they return to Dubai for the final test if they are to have any chance of even drawing the series.
The main thing I’ve been watching on the England Lions tour is England’s next two spin bowlers, Scott Borthwick (Durham) and Danny Briggs (Hampshire), despite playing less first class cricket than his rival Borthwick has found himself catapulted into the England One Day and Twenty20 sides ahead of Briggs who remains uncapped. A lot of people, me very much included feel Briggs is at this stage significantly ahead of Borthwick and the Lions tour has very much backed up that opinion. Look at these total figures from the four matches in the One Day series that both players featured in:
Borthwick: 34 overs, 3-127
Briggs: 36 overs, 8-135
As well as the fact Briggs has by far the better total figures, he actually ended up with better figures than Borthwick in each of the four matches that featured both players.
Clearly this was no fluke, maybe now the England selectors will see what most cricket fans have known for at least six months, that it’s time to give Danny Briggs a go in limited overs cricket and that Scott Borthwick isn’t as good as the selectors wish he was.
As far as I’m concerned, I mentioned in my blog before Christmas that I was hoping to make a late bid to get in the England squad for this summer’s blind cricket Ashes series. I’ve now had the hernia operation I had been waiting for and am recovering well, although I am still experiencing significant pain and it’ll still be at least a fortnight until I can attempt to play cricket, do fitness work or even lift anything heavy, the medical people are pleased with the speed the wound has healed at and they expect no complications.
So I’m feeling quite positive that once the pain eases and I am able to train I will be fit enough to give myself a chance of being selected, but that’s as positive as I can be right now as there is still a very long way to go before I’m even in a condition to be considered for selection.
By Dave Gavrilovic
http://www.twitter.com/DaveGavrilovic




























